Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Job Loss Leads to Death of 7 in Murder - Suicide

In a horrific murder-suicide, Ervin Anthony Lupoe shot and killed his wife and five young children, then took his own life Tuesday, in apparent despair after the couple lost their medical technician jobs at Kaiser Permanente in W. Los Angeles.

Ervin Lupoe even faxed a suicide note to KABC-TV (redacted letter here), a Southern California TV station.

"So after a horrendous ordeal my wife felt it better to end our lives and why leave our children in someone's (sic) else's hand's, in addition it seems Kiaser (sic) Permanente want's (sic) us to kill ourselves and take our family with us," Ervin Lupoe wrote in the letter.

That statement from Ervin Lupoe regarding Kaiser Permanente appears to stem from a different part of the letter, where he says his adminstrator said to him "you should not even had (sic) bothered to come to work today you should have blown your brains out."

While the fax seemed to assert that the mother, Ana Lupoe had planned the killings of the family, police Lt. John Romero said Ervin Lupoe was the main suspect, as a revolver was found next to his body and Ana Lupoe's body was found in an upstairs bedroom with the bodies of the couple's twin boys, Benjamin and Christian, 2.

At the same time, the bodies of Brittney Lupoe, 8 and twin girls Jazmin and Jassely Lupoe, 5, were found alongside Ervin Lupoe's in another bedroom.

All were shot in the head.

Tuesday afternoon, Kaiser Permanente issued a statement:

"We are deeply saddened to hear of the tragic deaths of Ervin Lupoe and his wife and family. Our sympathies are with all of their extended family and friends at this time. Ervin Lupoe and his wife are former employees of Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center."

Source


Saturday, January 24, 2009

Obama Sworn In Again, With Right Words, But No Bible


WASHINGTON POST

In golf, they call it a mulligan. A do-over.

There's no formal name for what President Obama and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. did last night.

After flubbing his one role on Inauguration Day -- administering the oath of office to Obama -- Roberts traveled to the White House to re-administer the oath.

Just to make sure.

"We decided it was so much fun . . .," Obama joked while sitting on a couch in the Map Room. Obama stood and walked over to make small talk with pool reporters as Roberts donned his black robe.

"Are you ready to take the oath?" Roberts asked.

"I am, and we're going to do it very slowly," Obama replied.

After a flawless recitation that included no Bible and took 25 seconds, Roberts smiled and said, "Congratulations, again."

Obama said, "Thank you, sir," and then added: "All right. The bad news for the [reporters] is there's 12 more balls."

A president is required by the Constitution to say, "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

At the inauguration, Roberts instead said: "that I will execute the office of president to the United States faithfully."

In a statement, White House counsel Greg Craig said the oath was re-administered "out of an abundance of caution."

"We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself," Craig's statement said.

Two presidents -- Calvin Coolidge and Chester A. Arthur -- have retaken the oath because of unusual circumstances the first time around.

The Map Room ceremony was less grand than the original one in front of the throng on the Mall.

But it was certainly warmer.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Barak Obama's Signature Analyzed!


Pennmanship analyst Caro Duncan reviewed the first official signature of our new president. After analyzing the signature, he sees a man who thinks fast, has high intelligence, and is able to adapt to varying situations.

“It is a bit of a relief for the whole world,” Ms Duncan, from the Australian Institute of Graphology, said. “He’s very diplomatic and tactful, capable of seeing the big picture and is at his best when he’s handling complex matters.”

The pronounced and embellished initials B and O reveal his pride and ambition, according to Ms Duncan. He is self confident and relishes the recognition of his own accomplishments.

Their size and position shows a love of the limelight, a pattern usually seen among actors and performers.

There is also a love of culture in there, an open mind to other people’s opinions and ideas.

“His inauguration day signature is a little more stretched than usual, which is very literal, it means that he’s got a lot on his shoulders,” Ms Duncan said.

“There’s always been an awareness of others in his handwriting but he reaches out that little bit more in today’s signature - he is genuinely listening.”

It however is not all positives. “There is disappointment there, too,” Ms Duncan sayd.

His Christian name is slightly more coherent than his surname, hinting at disappointment with his father or family.

They are pangs the left-hander is able to face on his own. While left-handers usually slope to the right President Obama does not, showing his self-sufficient nature.

Bart Baggett from the Handwriting University says his handwriting is comparable to former US Presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan with but one omission - a high and long t-bar indicating extremely high self-esteem and visionary thinking.

“Obama crosses his Ts at an average height, reflecting a good self esteem and humility,” he said.

Before George W. Bush became president in 2000, graphologist Katie Darden analysed his writing and found a strong persistence and resistance to being told what to do - a desire to make his own way and stand firm on issues that mattered to him.

“These characteristics, if taken to an extreme, could result in some interesting stand offs,” Ms Darden wrote 9 years ago.

Story source: here


Monday, January 12, 2009

US consigns 3,000 tonnes of ammunition to Israel

Something's fishy about the latest developments in Israeli-Iranian (verbal) and Israeli-Palestinian (de facto) conflicts. While USA seems to be over-worried about the national security on inauguration day, it's Zionist wing seems to be doing a big time in Israel.






US consigns 3,000 tonnes of "ammunition" to Israel
(source)


The US Navy's Military Sealift Command is hiring a merchant ship to carry the arms on two separate journeys from the Greek port of Astakos to Israel in mid-to-late January, according to Reuters. A 'hazardous material" designation on the manifest mentions explosive substances and detonators, but no other details. One broker said that the size of a shipment of this kind has not been seen for years.DEBKAfile's military sources note that the Israel's air, ground, tank and sea offensive against Hamas in Gaza entered its 15th day Saturday, Jan. 10.


Unusually Large U.S. Weapons Shipment to Israel: Are the US and Israel Planning a Broader Middle East War?

by Michel Chossudovsky

A very large delivery of US weaponry to Israel consisting of 3,000 tons of "ammunition" is scheduled to sail to Israel. The size and nature of the shipments are described as "unusual":

"Shipping 3,000-odd tons of ammunition in one go is a lot," one broker said, on condition of anonymity.

"This (kind of request) is pretty rare and we haven't seen much of it quoted in the market over the years," he added.

"Shipping brokers in London who have specialized in moving arms for the British and U.S. military in the past said such ship charters to Israel were rare. (Reuters, Jan 10, 2009)

The Pentagon has entrusted a Greek merchant shipping company to deliver the weapons to Israel:

"The U.S. is seeking to hire a merchant ship to deliver hundreds of tons of arms to Israel from Greece later this month, tender documents seen by Reuters show.

The U.S. Navy's Military Sealift Command (MSC) said the ship was to carry 325 standard 20-foot containers of what is listed as "ammunition" on two separate journeys from the Greek port of Astakos to the Israeli port of Ashdod in mid-to-late January.

A "hazardous material" designation on the manifest mentions explosive substances and detonators, but no other details were given.(Ibid)

It is worth noting that a similar unusually large shipment of US ordinance to Israel was scheduled in early December:

"Tender documents indicate that the German ship hired by the US in early December also carried a massive cargo of weapons that weighed over 2.6 million kg [2600 tons] and filled up to 989 standard 20-foot containers to Ashdod from North Carolina." (Press TV, 10 Jan 2009)

Are These Large Shipments of Ordinance Connected to the Invasion of Gaza?

The request by the Pentagon to transport ordinance in a commercial vessel, according to Reuters, was made on December 31, 4 days after the commencement of the aerial bombings of Gaza by F16 Fighter jets.

Analysts have hastily concluded, without evidence, that the 2 shipments of "ammunition" were intended to supply Israel's armed forces in support of its military invasion of Gaza.

"A senior military analyst in London who declined to be named said that, because of the timing, the shipments could be "irregular" and linked to the Gaza offensive." (Reuters, January 10, 2009)

These reports are mistaken. Delivery of ordinance always precedes the onslaught of a military operation. The ordinance required under "Operation Cast Lead" was decided upon in June 2008. Further to Tel Aviv's request under the US military aid program to Israel, the U.S. Congress approved in September 2008 the transfer of 1,000 bunker-buster high precision GPS-guided Small Diameter Guided Bomb Units 39 (GBU-39).

The GBU 39 smart bombs produced by Boeing were delivered to Israel in November. They were used in the initial air raids on Gaza:

"...The Israel Air Force has used the new lightweight GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb acquired from the USA, in the recent attacks in Gaza. The [Jerusalem] Post mentioned the new weapons ordered last September having arrived last month [November], and already put to action with the IAF fighters. These weapons could have been deployed by the Boeing/IAF F-15Is, since sofar SDB is cleared for use only with this type of aircraft.

It is highly unlikely that the bulk of the weaponry included in these two large shipments, scheduled to arrive in Israel in late January, is intended to be used in Israel's military operation in Gaza. The GBU-39 is lightweight (130 kg). The entire shipment of GBU 39s (1000 units) would be of the order of a modest 130 tons. In other words, the specifications of the GBU 39 do not match the description of the "unusually large" and "heavy" shipment of ordinance.


Escalation Scenario

The shipment ordered on December 31 is of the order of 3000 tons, an unusually large and heavy cargo of "ammunition" pointing to the transfer of heavy weaponry to Israel.

According to US military statements, the ordinance is for stockpiling, to be used "at short notice" in the eventuality of a conflict:

"This previously scheduled shipment is routine and not in support of the current situation in Gaza. ...The U.S. military pre-positions stockpiles in some countries in case it needs supplies at short notice." (Reuters, 10 Jan 2009, emphasis added)

Whatever the nature of these large weapons shipments, they are intended for use in a future military operation in the Middle East.

Since the launching of the Theater Iran Near Term Operation Operation (TIRANNT) in May 2003, an escalation scenario involving military action directed against Iran and Syria has been envisaged. TIRANNT was followed by a series of military plans pertaining to Iran. Numerous official statements and US military documents have pointed to an expanded Middle East war.

What these shipments suggest is that the "escalation scenario" not only prevails, but has reached a more active stage in the process of US-Israeli military planning.

Whether these weapons will be used or not is not known. The central question, in this regard, is whether the Gaza invasion is part of a broader military adventure directed against Lebanon, Syria and Iran, in which heavier weaponry including US made bunker buster bombs will be used.

History of US Weapons Shipments to Israel

The stockpiling of US made bunker buster bombs by Israel has been ongoing since 2005:

"The United States will sell Israel nearly 5,000 smart bombs in one of the largest weapons deals between the allies in years.

Among the bombs the [Israeli] air force will get are 500 one-ton bunker busters that can penetrate two-meter-thick cement walls; 2,500 regular one-ton bombs; 1,000 half-ton bombs; and 500 quarter-ton bombs. The bombs Israel is acquiring include airborne versions, guidance units, training bombs and detonators. They are guided by an existing Israeli satellite used by the military.

The sale will augment existing Israeli supplies of smart bombs. The Pentagon told Congress that the bombs are meant to maintain Israel's qualitative advantage [against Iran], and advance U.S. strategic and tactical interests." (Jewish Virtual Library: September 21-22, 2004, Haaretz / Jerusalem Post.)

The actual shipments of US made bunker buster bombs started in 2005. The US approved in April 2005, the delivery of:

some 5,000 "smart air launched weapons" including some 500 BLU 109 'bunker-buster bombs. The (uranium coated) munitions are said to be more than 'adequate to address the full range of Iranian targets, with the possible exception of the buried facility at Natanz, which may require the [more powerful] BLU-113 bunker buster [a variant of the GBU 28]'" (See Michel Chossudovsky, Planned US-Israeli Nuclear Attack on Iran, Global Research, May 1, 2005)

The BLU-109 is smaller than the GBU 28. "It is a 2,000lbs warhead that can be used in combination with a GPS guidance kit [...], and can penetrate up to 15 feet of fortified concrete."

In 2006 at the height of the Lebanon War in August 2006, a major shipment of the 2.2 ton GBU 28 bombs, according to the New York Times, was dispatched to Israel.

The GBU 28 is produced by Raytheon. It was used against Iraq in the 1991 Gulf War, has the the capability of penetrating some 20 feet of reinforced concrete (Haaretz, 9 Nov 2008). In contrast to the GBU 39 smart bombs (130 kg) used against Gaza, each GBU-28 weighs a hefty 2.2 tons.

"The Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28) is a special weapon developed for penetrating hardened Iraqi command centers located deep underground. The GBU-28 is a 5,000-pound laser-guided conventional munition that uses a 4,400-pound penetrating warhead." (For a visual depiction see "Bob Sherman, How the GBU-28 works", USA Today on-line.).

The recent unusually large shipments of weaponry to Israel are part of the 2004 agreement between Washington and Tel Aviv, financed by US military aid to Israel.

As mentioned above, there is a history of delivery of bunker buster bombs (including the GBU 28), going back to 2005. While the nature and composition of these recent weapons shipments to Israel are not known, one suspects that they include the heavier version of the bunker buster bombs including the GBU-28.

In this regard, it is worth noting that last Summer, Israel requested the Pentagon to deliver GBU-28 bunker buster bombs. The stated purpose was to use them in the eventuality of a military operation directed against Iran.

In September 2008, according to US and Israeli press reports quoting Pentagon officials, Tel Aviv's request was turned down. According to the reports, Washington categorically refused to deliver the shipment of GBU 28 bunker buster bombs, to be used to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. "Instead" Washington accepted to deliver the lightweight GBU-39 for use against Gaza.

The U.S. had "rejected an Israeli request for military equipment and support that would improve Israel's ability to attack Iran's nuclear facilities."

The Americans viewed [Israel's] request, which was transmitted (and rejected) at the highest level, as a sign that Israel is in the advanced stages of preparations to attack Iran. They therefore warned Israel against attacking, saying such a strike would undermine American interests. They also demanded that Israel give them prior notice if it nevertheless decided to strike Iran. In early September, Haaretz reported that the request had included GBU-28 "bunker-buster" bombs.

In mid-September, the U.S. agreed instead to sell Israel 1000 GBU-39 "bunker buster" bombs which Israeli military experts said "could provide a powerful new weapon" in Gaza, AP reported.

So: when Israel requested weapons that the U.S. expected would be used for bombing Iran, the U.S. said no, and added explicitly that it did not want to see an Israeli attack on Iran. And there was no Israeli attack on Iran. (Defense Update.com, December 2008)

Media Disinformation

The official statements and press reports are bogus. Israel and the US have always acted in close coordination. Washington does not "demand that Israel give them prior notice" of a military operation:

The report in Haaretz suggests that the Bush Administration was adamant and did not want the Israelis to attack Iran. In fact, the reports suggested that the US would shoot down Israeli planes, if they tried to attack Iran:

"Air-space authorization: An attack on Iran would apparently require passage through Iraqi air space. For this to occur, an air corridor would be needed that Israeli fighter jets could cross without being targeted by American planes or anti-aircraft missiles. The Americans also turned down this request. According to one account, to avoid the issue, the Americans told the Israelis to ask Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki for permission, along the lines of "If you want, coordinate with him." (Haaretz Nov 9, 2008)

This Israeli report is misleading. Israel is America's ally. Military operations are closely coordinated. Israel does not act without Washington's approval and the US does not shoot down the planes of its closest ally.

The Nature and Composition of the Recent US Weapons Shipments to Israel

These unusually large shipments of ordinance would normally require Congressional approval. To our knowledge, there is no public record of approval of the unusually large shipments of heavy "ammunition" to Israel.

The nature and composition of the shipments are not known. Was Israel's request for the delivery of the 2.2 ton GBU 28 accepted by Washington, bypassing the US Congress? Are GBU 28 bombs, each of which weighs 2.2 tons part of the 3000 ton shipments to Israel. Are tactical bunker buster mini-nuclear bombs included in Israel's arsenal? These are questions to be raised in the US Congress.

The two shipments of "ammunition" are slated to arrive in Israel, respectively no later than the 25th and 31st of January.

Secretary Robert Gates who remains at the helm of the Department of Defense ensures continuity in the military agenda.

Preparing for a Confrontation with Iran: Beefing Up Israel's Missile Defense System

In early January, the Pentagon dispatched some 100 military personnel to Israel from US European Command (EUCOM) to assist Israel in setting up a new sophisticated X-band early warning radar system. This project is part of the military aid package to Israel approved by the Pentagon in September 2008:

"The Israeli government requested the system to help defend against a potential missile attack from Iran. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates signed off on the deployment order in mid-September. ....

Once fully operational, the system will be capable of tracking and identifying small objects at long distance and at very high altitude, including space, according to U.S. Missile Defense Agency officials. It also will integrate Israel’s missile defenses with the U.S. global missile detection network.

“This will enable the Israelis to track medium- and long-range ballistic missiles multiple times better than their current radar allows them to,” Morrell said. “It will … more than double the range of Israel's missile defense radars and increase its available engagement time.”

This, he said, will greatly enhance Israel’s defensive capabilities. “There is a growing ballistic missile threat in the region, particularly from Iran,” Morrell said. “And no one in the region should feel more nervous about that threat than the Israelis. And they clearly do, and they have asked for our assistance.” (Defense Talk.com, January 6, 2009, emphasis added.)

The new X-band radar system 'permits an intercept soon after launch over enemy instead of friendly territory" (Sen. Joseph Azzolina, Protecting Israel from Iran's missiles, Bayshore News, December 26, 2008).

The X-band radar would "integrate Israel’s missile defenses with the U.S. global missile detection network, which includes satellites, Aegis ships on the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Red Sea, and land-based Patriot radars and interceptors." (Ibid)

What this means is that Washington calls the shots. The US rather than Israel would control the Air Defense system: ''This is and will remain a U.S. radar system,' Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said. 'So this is not something we are giving or selling to the Israelis and it is something that will likely require U.S. personnel on-site to operate.'" (Quoted in Israel National News, January 9, 2009, emphasis added).

In other words, the US military controls Israel's Air Defense system, which is integrated into the US global missile defense system. Under these circumstances, Israel cannot launch a war against Iran without the consent of the US High Command.

The large shipments of US ordinance, slated to arrive in Israel after the inauguration of Barack Obama as President of the United States and Commander in Chief are part of the broader program of US-Israeli military cooperation in relation to Iran.

The reinforcement of Israel's missile defenses combined with the large shipments of US weapons are part of an escalation scenario, which could lead the World under an Obama Administration into a broader Middle East war.

New Cold War?

There has been a military build on both sides. Iran has responded to the Israeli-US initiative, by beefing up it own missile defense system with the support of Russia. According to reports (December 21), Moscow and Tehran have been holding talks on the supply by Russia of "medium-range air defense systems - specifically, S-300 surface-to-air missile systems" (Asian Times, January 9, 2009)

You are not welcome not to comment this!

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Another False Flag Attack on the Way?

And so it begins...

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The outgoing White House administration will next week hold a joint "disaster scenario" exercise with top members of the incoming team of president-elect Barack Obama, US officials said Friday.
Source: Yahoo News

After reading this, I left my thoughts wander for a bit... Hey, wasn't it the same scenario when NY 9/11 and London 7/7 happen?

Arts & Stats

Paulo Coelho once wrote something like: "If something happened once, it might never happen again. But if it happened twice, it will happen for the third time for sure."
According to 9/11 whistleblowers and conspiracy theorists, some of 37% US citizens believe that 9/11 was "false flag staged by and used by US Government as worldwide accepted excuse for further military operations". If you are not in that group, ask yourself just who profited the most from 9/11 tragedy? Or even better, let's put all the arguments aside and let's discuss this: if you are ready to believe that some of 20 average individuals could overpass the security system of the most advanced civilization known to history, then you are even greater conspiracist than me!


I have no doubt another false flag is on the way. The only question is: when?
That is not hard to answer either... One could simply put the answer as "when US Government needs it", but that's not all to it. Government is not the boss here, not in this story...

Who's the Boss?

Have you noticed lately that every time US Government is short with the money they need to borrow? Precisely, they ask for the loan from Fed! So, Fed is the boss. It's their money.
It has been a long time since US Government lost the control over the state finance giving out the money printing right to the Bank of Federal Reserves. The best part is: Fed is "quasi-public (government entity with private components)". So, the real answer is: "Another false flag attack will happen when the people who print the dollar say so! And they are private bankers."

But what is the point of false flag attacks against US and how would private bankers profit from it?
Watch the video for the answer:


How do you sleep Mr. Rockefeller?



Saturday, January 10, 2009

Web Bots Project Concept

Web Bot Project is run by two guys who also call themselves "Time Monks". 
If you've ever read the theory of K.G. Jung and his "collective subconsciousness", you'll find it easy to understand their theory of "collective awareness". But they have completely different method of reaching subconscious part of humankind: not by analytical psychology like Mr. Jung did, but simply using the greatest collection of human thoughts: The Internet.



Here is how: they let the web bots (web spiders) crawl the Net for fresh information (Like this forum and zillions of other websites) and let the crawler store harvested records to their computer. Now, the next step is analyzing records and searching data for fresh the trends in expression. 
Comparing the trends with the major events that happened during the development of the Web Bot Project, they found out that certain terminology is statistically correlated with adequate events - with high significance. This terminology is what they call "predictive linguistics".
At first, the used predictive linguistics to forecast the trends at the stock markets. They did it (and still do with great success). However, they have noticed that the records they gather from Net can also predict some major events like 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, wars here and there...



This was the shortest possible description. Anyway, for more details - here is great link where you can download pdf. file with the predictions for 2009:




2012 Insiders?

I am great fan of what people do at Web Bots Project. Hard workers, great concept! Here is one of their latest doomsday leaking news from potential doomsday whistleblowers. It seems that some people actually know the exact details about upcoming apocalypse! The story goes like:

"Problematic" 2012?

Something caught my eye the other day in an email from the time monks up at www.halfpasthuman.com. They sent along this really interesting story out of Belgium that began...

"Some 20 Belgians plan their escape" 
BRUSSELS - January 8th, 2009 - A group of Belgian individuals plan to leave their social and material status behind (!!!), according to their ultimate escape plan they prepare on the internet. The group consists of man and women between 20 and 40 age old."
Ah..bogslife (beyond organizational & governmental structures is going global...is that my point, you're thinking? Or, that 'survivalism' is a contagious way of thinking?

Well, yes...and no.



The 'no' part gets scary because the part that really dropped my jaw was this:
"Today NASA keeps precise track of the North pole traveling South, and they admit that the speed of the North Pole´s acceleration increased dramatically the last few years. Furthermore, NASA recently confirmed there will be a `problematic weakening´ of the Earth's protective magnetic field around 2012.."
Whoa, Cowboy! Say what? I started to scratch my head and wonder "What do they mean by a problematic weakening"? "...around 2012..."???

Go with me on this: This 'problematic 2012' weakening seems to be something the insiders know about and this could be just the leading edge of a disclosure of something much m uch bigger coming down the timeline towards us.

And then I about fell over today when I happened across the FoxNews story headlined "Powerful Solar Storm could shut down U.S. For Months".

I don't claim to be a 'dot connector' extraordinaire, but seems to me that this could be the tipping of the elite's hand a bit to the watchful observer. Play it through as many times as I have in my mind, I don't see a solar event shutting down the 'U.S. For Months" as any kind of a happy, peaceful, vacation kind of event.

I got to thinking about about the impacts on transportation, energy, and food production, possibly right down to the farm-level, and I thought "You know, this preparedness stuff makes sense at some level if you want to maintain personal independence doesn't it?"

For now this 2012 stuff is problematic (Which I'd take to mean debatable). But, as we've seen in many disclosures in the past, this is how a leading edge of a big change-state could be introduced into the thinking of society, so we'll have some degree of focus on the way this rolls out.


The story has been taken from here.

Top Secrets

Alternative News

Financial Doom

  © Blogger templates Romantico by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP